Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/T Mills
Tools
Actions
General
Print/export
In other projects
Appearance
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
- The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.
The result was delete. -- Cirt (talk) 03:14, 7 May 2011 (UTC)[reply]
- T. Mills (edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views) – (View log)
- (Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)
Does not meet WP:MUSICBIO. Seems not to have significant coverage in secondary sources. --Demiurge1000 (talk) 05:06, 15 April 2011 (UTC)[reply]
- Comment Would the Warped Tour appearences alluded to in the article not satisfy Criterion 4 of WP:BAND? Subject does appear to have been written about, e.g. here, presumably there will be other instances. Catfish Jim & the soapdish 09:55, 15 April 2011 (UTC)[reply]
- Note: This debate has been included in the list of Bands and musicians-related deletion discussions. -- • Gene93k (talk) 23:25, 16 April 2011 (UTC)[reply]
- Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion so a clearer consensus may be reached.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, Ron Ritzman (talk) 00:21, 22 April 2011 (UTC)[reply]
- Delete - Per WP:RS. Monterey Bay (talk) 03:26, 22 April 2011 (UTC)[reply]
- Keep has released an EP + a full-length album on a notable label, has performed in Warped Tour and The Bamboozle, thus complies with WP:NMUSIC. Surely reliable sources can be found. Dragquennom (talk) 17:30, 22 April 2011 (UTC)[reply]
- Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion so a clearer consensus may be reached.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, Logan Talk Contributions 02:15, 1 May 2011 (UTC)[reply]
- Delete per nom. Keb25 (talk) 07:22, 1 May 2011 (UTC)[reply]
- Strong delete, he's nothing more than just a kid with disgusting stretched earlobes who wants to get popular and yet achieved that dream through 14 year old scene girls, only worse; he jumpstarted himself through autotuned rapping. Ugghh!! Delete this article! The chances of him being notable is about the chance that any other artist that were signed to Uprising at the time got their article kept by nomination. Only in this case, I can't complain that Mills isn't even about half as notable as good bands that are on the label like Broadway. - GunMetal Angel 01:22, 3 May 2011 (UTC)[reply]
- Delete- It's not about being a kid based on which the article should be deleted but the subject is not notable.--Nidhi. mehta333 (talk) 13:05, 3 May 2011 (UTC)[reply]
- Comment The subject has released a full length album under a notable label. To closing admin: the subject of the article has received significant coverage in the following independent sources: [1] and [2] I do not know if this makes him notable, but please check out if it does and/or passes WP:MUSICBIO/WP:GNG. Thanks, Dragquennom (talk) 13:10, 3 May 2011 (UTC)[reply]
- So? As my comment says above, the band Broadway released their album Kingdoms through Uprising as well yet they had their article deleted three times. Also High Wire Daze and Hip Hop Press don't compare to Alternative Press or BTV of which Broadway both had a part in. -- GunMetal Angel 08:37, 4 May 2011 (UTC)[reply]
- The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.